WEKO3
アイテム
コモン・ロー，憲法，自由(8・完) ―19世紀後期アメリカ法理論とLochner判決―
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12077
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12077697fdab8-69b3-4f3b-87b7-60b3051a42b1
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
本文を見る (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-07-29 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | コモン・ロー，憲法，自由(8・完) ―19世紀後期アメリカ法理論とLochner判決― | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Common Law, the Constitution, and Liberty: Legal Theory in the LateNineteenth Century and Its Influence upon Lochner (8) | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 生ける憲法 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 原意主義 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | コモン・ロー的憲法論 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者 |
清水, 潤
× 清水, 潤
|
|||||||||
| 著者別名(英) | ||||||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||||||
| 識別子 | 29300 | |||||||||
| 姓名 | Shimizu, Jun | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This article examines the common law backgrounds of late nineteenth and early twentieth century American constitutional theory. At that time, the Supreme Court of the United States declared many socioeconomic regulations, including labor laws, to be void under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. According to conventional wisdom, conservative justices hated progressive social reform and preferred big business. For those reasons, it is said, they held the laws unconstitutional. However, this paper proposes another explanation. Constitutional theory at that time was based on the common law tradition. Justices in the Lochner era tended to defend common law rights and common law principles in their constitutional interpretations. They considered constitutional rights protected by the Constitution to have been derived from the common law tradition. This last installment of this article examines today’s situation of constitutional law and common law. Unlike the nineteenth century, the deep relationship between the common law and the Constitution has largely disappeared. Constitutional rights are no longer only related to persons and property derived from the common law. Rather, the Supreme Court of the United States has created constitutional jurisprudence independent of the common law. For instance, the defamation law of the common law is no longer relevant the defamation law of the common law is no longer relevant to the First Amendment jurisprudence. Moreover, equal protection and privacy interests protected by the due process clauses are not rooted in the common law. However, even today the common law exerts some influence over constitutional jurisprudence. For instance, some scholars who support “living constitutionalism” say the common law tradition is composed of the unwritten constitution of the United States. Another scholar says that constitutional jurisprudence has evolved in the same way as common law development. Originalists, the strongest opponents of living constitutionalism, insist the common law at the time of the framing the Constitution is relevant to constitutional jurisprudence today. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia believed the Second and Fourth Amendments should be interpreted according to the common law at the time of framing. Similarly, some scholars argue that the Constitution should be interpreted in accordance with the understanding of the common law in the late eighteenth century. The common law is to some extent relevant to constitutional law even today. However, its influence is limited compared to the nineteenth century. Today, lawyers refer to the common law as one of many historical sources from which constitutional meaning is derived. |
|||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
中央ロー・ジャーナル 巻 15, 号 4, p. 69-92, 発行日 2019-03-31 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会 | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1349-6239 | |||||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||||
| 権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
