{"created":"2023-05-15T13:51:27.075104+00:00","id":12589,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"d671a6d6-ca95-44f3-bded-2ab036e7708f"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"12589","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"12589"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00012589","sets":["275:725"]},"author_link":["46036"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2020-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"4","bibliographicPageEnd":"109","bibliographicPageStart":"75","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"16","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"中央ロー・ジャーナル"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":" This section first discusses the two rationales that support the doctrine of comparative negligence: fairness and deterrence. Deterrence means preventing accidents. It reflects the social policy of minimizing damages by encouraging both parties to pay attention. This is quite similar to the rationale of economic efficiency in the doctrine of avoidable consequences. They are both default rules that are applicable in absence of an agreement about a matter in dispute. \n In this article, the main question is why an injured party should behave reasonably in the absence of contractual obligation. The concept of the default rule for economic efficiency or deterrence would seem to provide an answer. Comparative negligence in Japan should be recognized as the default rule, and an injured party should be required to behave reasonably for economic efficiency. \n Comparative negligence in Japan can be justified because an injured party who ignores this social requirement should bear some part of damages.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_full_name_32":{"attribute_name":"著者別名(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"46036","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"SAITO, Kou","nameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-6239","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"齋藤, 航"},{"creatorName":"サイトウ, コウ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2020-11-17"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"1349-6239_16_4_75_109.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"998.7 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"本文を見る","url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/12589/files/1349-6239_16_4_75_109.pdf"},"version_id":"270efc61-3500-48cd-baf5-087505add581"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"過失相殺","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"損害賠償","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"比較過失","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"回避可能な結果","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"損害軽減義務","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"avoidable consequence","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"comparative negligence","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質(5･完)","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質(5･完)"},{"subitem_title":"“Comparative Negligence” in the Law of Contract (5)","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"1","path":["725"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2020-11-17"},"publish_date":"2020-11-17","publish_status":"0","recid":"12589","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質(5･完)"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T17:15:28.643458+00:00"}