@article{oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00012936,
 author = {石井, 夏生利},
 journal = {国際情報学研究},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, This study discusses the legal issues relating to the “right to be forgotten”, focusing on the deletion of search results,by examining recent discussions in the European Union and Japan. The analysis is based on the three decisions made by the Court of Justice of the European Union in 2014 and 2019, provisions stipulating the“right to be forgotten” in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), uidelines on the criteria of this right in the search engine cases under the GDPR, the Japanese Supreme Court decision in 2017, subsequent decisions made by lower courts, and the amendment of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Protection of Japan in 2020. The findings of this study identified the following issues as those requiring further analysis : (1) the legal position of a search engine provider, (2) legal interpretation of how search engine activities contribute to the freedom of expression, (3) the burden of proof between, and (4) how to strike the balance of interests between a search engine provider and an applicant when sensitive data is concerned.
In addition to an objective analysis of the EU and Japanese discussions regarding the deletion of search results,legal effects on entities other than search engine providers should also be taken into account.},
 pages = {21--42},
 title = {「忘れられる権利」を巡る近時の議論 : 検索結果削除請求権を中心に},
 volume = {1},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {イシイ, カオリ}
}