{"created":"2023-05-15T13:53:17.214238+00:00","id":16134,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"d3fcedfe-e0a7-40ce-b330-e8bdb654d2ef"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"16134","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"16134"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00016134","sets":["275:1009"]},"author_link":["56379"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-12-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicPageEnd":"52","bibliographicPageStart":"3","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"18","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"中央ロー・ジャーナル"},{"bibliographic_title":"Chuo Law Journal","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) authorizes United States federal district courts to order discovery from persons residing in orfound in the district for use in foreign orinternational tribunal proceedings. \nHowever, whether a foreign private arbitral tribunal falls within the meaning of “tribunal” in the act has long been a matter of dispute. \nThe U.S. Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is widely considered to be the leading case related to §1782 discovery. However, it did not directly involve a foreign private arbitral tribunal. Federal courts have interpreted Intel in different ways. \nThe Courts of Appeal for the Fourth and Sixth Circuits decided that the statute was applicable to a foreign private arbitral tribunal. The Second, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits ruled otherwise. \nThe reasoning in the cases involved consideration of the literal meaning of the statute, \nlegislative history, scholarly opinion, availability of judicial review of an arbitral award (functional\ntest), comparison with domestic arbitration (Federal Arbitration Act §7), consideration of\ninherent flexibility, and the cost-saving features of arbitration. \nA Seventh Circuit case is now under review by the Supreme Court. A decision, expected by mid-2022, could resolve the Circuits’ split of opinion.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_full_name_32":{"attribute_name":"著者別名(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"56379","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"ABE, Mmichiaki","nameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-6239","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"阿部, 道明"},{"creatorName":"アベ, ミチアキ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2022-09-07"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"1349-6239_18_3_3_52.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"本文を見る","url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/16134/files/1349-6239_18_3_3_52.pdf"},"version_id":"7f3681fc-e425-4e1f-9385-c6d10fd8124b"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"国際仲裁","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"ディスカバリー","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"International arbitration","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"discovery","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"国際仲裁とディスカバリー ―合衆国法典28篇1782条(a)の適用の可否―","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"国際仲裁とディスカバリー ―合衆国法典28篇1782条(a)の適用の可否―"},{"subitem_title":"International Arbitration and Discovery: Is Discovery by 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) Applicable to Foreign Private Arbitration?","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"1","path":["1009"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2022-09-07"},"publish_date":"2022-09-07","publish_status":"0","recid":"16134","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["国際仲裁とディスカバリー ―合衆国法典28篇1782条(a)の適用の可否―"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T15:29:13.607125+00:00"}