{"created":"2023-09-13T02:33:26.092123+00:00","id":2000084,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"b7a3a812-8efb-4c21-9bf7-6bc3e4544524"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2000084","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000084"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000084","sets":["333:1694049340010"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2000084","item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-02-19","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3-4","bibliographicPageEnd":"320","bibliographicPageStart":"265","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"127","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は、四一五条二項の「履行に代わる損害賠償請求」を識別するための示唆をドイツにおける損害賠償種類の議論に求め、特に同議論における多数説と目される時期的区分説に着目する。\n　時期的区分説は、基準としての明晰性という利点を持っているが、同説内で時期的区分は必ずしも徹底されていない。その中でも、Faust 説・Lorenz 説は、同説の代表的見解であって、時期的区分を徹底しながら、ドイツ民法の履行優先原則については、損害賠償種類以外の解釈枠組で配慮することを、重要な個別テーマである早期代替取引費用の賠償対象性に即して、試みている。この試みにより、一方で時期的区分説の基準としての明晰性が保持され、他方で、履行優先原則が、損害賠償種類を用いずに無理なく尊重されるならば、同説は、他説にない明晰性がある分、優位に立つことになる。\n　このような認識に立ち、本稿は、時期的区分説に立った早期代替取引費用をめぐる解釈論を、Faust説・Lorenz 説を中心に跡づけて、関連のドイツ判例にも目を配りながら、損害賠償種類論としての時期的区分説の理論的・実質的妥当性を、批判的に検証する。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"高田,淳","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"タカダ,アツシ"},{"creatorName":"TAKADA,Atsushi"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"0009-6296_127_3_4_265-320.pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000084/files/0009-6296_127_3_4_265-320.pdf"},"version_id":"c6d3830d-db8f-4604-a8b6-5d235db9d1a3"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"損害種類","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"損害賠償種類","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"履行に代わる損害賠償","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"填補賠償","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"履行優先原則","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"代替取引","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"時期的区分","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"損害現象論","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"給付に代わる損害賠償","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"給付と並存する損害賠償","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Grigoleit","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Riehm","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Lorenz","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Faust","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Gsell","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kaiser","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Ostendorf","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Benicke/Hellwig","subitem_subject_language":"de","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"田中洋","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"福田清明","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"損害賠償種類論における時期的区分説の検証 : 早期代替取引費用の賠償対象性を素材として","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"損害賠償種類論における時期的区分説の検証 : 早期代替取引費用の賠償対象性を素材として","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Kritik an der „Zauberformel“ über Schadensarten","subitem_title_language":"de"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1694049340010"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-09-13"},"publish_date":"2023-09-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000084","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["損害賠償種類論における時期的区分説の検証 : 早期代替取引費用の賠償対象性を素材として"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-04T01:26:44.214079+00:00"}