{"created":"2023-11-01T01:44:39.809478+00:00","id":2000309,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"b79e427f-810f-4e2f-814b-5bf7570a7a26"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2000309","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000309"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000309","sets":["275:1698802292507"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2022-12-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicPageEnd":"64","bibliographicPageStart":"25","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"19","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"中央ロー・ジャーナル","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"Intellectual property rights have the character of monopoly or exclusive rights. The enforcement of such rights is always accompanied by the problem of adverse effects on competition. Use of the Antimonopoly Act (AMA) is one way of addressing this difficulty. In litigation for infringement of\nintellectual property rights such as patents, a patentee’s request for an injunction or damages might be denied for violating the AMA. This kind of approach is common in the U.S., but only a few examples have occurred in Japan. In July of 2020, the Tokyo District Court dismissed a claim by a patentee on the grounds that its actions constituted a violation of the AMA and an abuse of rights (Ricoh case).\nThis article examines allegations of AMA violations in patent infringement litigation. Part 1 introduces past cases on how printer manufacturers’ changes in specifications were evaluated under the AMA. Part 2 focuses directly on the Ricoh case, which went to the High Court. That court ruled in favor of the patentee. The article clarifies the reasons for the difference in decisions.\nIt also shows that the basic decision-making framework at the High Court was the same as that in the District Court.\nPart 3 of the article examines related issues, including (1) Article 21 of the AMA, (2) FRAND (fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory terms), and (3) the criteria for judgment of abuse of rights.\nThe significance of such claims will surely increase in Japan. The method of alleging AMA\nviolations should be actively utilized to prevent abuse of rights, in addition to relying on the Patent\nLaw itself.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1349-6239","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"泉,克幸","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"イズミ,カツユキ"},{"creatorName":"IZUMI,Katsuyuki"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"1349-6239_19_3_25_64.pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000309/files/1349-6239_19_3_25_64.pdf"},"version_id":"cadcb226-99d5-45e2-bdf7-84998705a11a"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"特許権","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"侵害訴訟","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"独占禁止法","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"権利濫用","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"patent","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"litigation","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"infringement","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Antimonopoly Act","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Antitrust Law","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"abuse of right","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"特許権の侵害訴訟における独禁法違反の主張と権利濫用","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"特許権の侵害訴訟における独禁法違反の主張と権利濫用","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Allegations of Antitrust Law Violations and Abuse of Rights in Patent Infringement Litigation","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1698802292507"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-11-01"},"publish_date":"2023-11-01","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000309","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["特許権の侵害訴訟における独禁法違反の主張と権利濫用"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-11-01T02:02:04.410142+00:00"}