{"created":"2023-11-10T08:35:19.862138+00:00","id":2000355,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"028ba47b-ca16-4f02-957f-04b9d9919269"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2000355","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000355"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000355","sets":["333:1699597328745"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"9-10","bibliographicPageEnd":"358","bibliographicPageStart":"341","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"127 ","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　本評釈は、札幌高裁令和元年七月一二日判決に関するものであり、論点は次の三つである。第一に、株主総会へ出席する者に対する株主資格を審査する方法の妥当性、第二に、定款によって議決権の代理行使に関して資格制限を設けている場合の内容及び拒絶判断の妥当性、第三に、本件において妨害予防請求権を認めることの妥当性である。結論としては賛成であるが、論旨には検討すべき点があると考える。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"高間,佐知子","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"タカマ,サチコ"},{"creatorName":"TAKAMA,Sachiko"}]}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"代理人資格","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"株主","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"株主総会決議","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"議決権行使","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"議決権の代理行使","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"株主総会の決議取消し","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"定款自治","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"届出印","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"弁護士","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"妨害排除請求","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"株主総会における出席者の株主資格の審査方法および議決権の代理行使に関する資格制限の可否","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"株主総会における出席者の株主資格の審査方法および議決権の代理行使に関する資格制限の可否","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1699597328745"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-11-09"},"publish_date":"2023-11-09","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000355","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["株主総会における出席者の株主資格の審査方法および議決権の代理行使に関する資格制限の可否"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-11-10T08:35:25.283257+00:00"}