{"created":"2023-11-10T08:35:25.797167+00:00","id":2000357,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"573ce174-8f4f-4595-a4e3-1c1ea259eb3d"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2000357","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000357"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000357","sets":["333:1699597328745"]},"author_link":[],"control_number":"2000357","item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-03-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"9-10","bibliographicPageEnd":"387","bibliographicPageStart":"373","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"127","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は、被害者の自動車に取り付けたGPS機器を用いて、被害者の動静を観察した被告人についてストーカー規制法二条一項一号が成立するとした原判決を破棄して差し戻した事案について、過去の類似の裁判例との比較検討を中心に論ずるものである。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"海老澤,侑","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"エビサワ,ススム"},{"creatorName":"EBISAWA,Susumu"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"0009-6296_127_9_10_373-387.pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000357/files/0009-6296_127_9_10_373-387.pdf"},"version_id":"85a3882f-853c-4ec6-a9da-fd72a5d62d57"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"ストーカー規制法","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"見張り","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"GPS機器","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"上田正基","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"橋爪隆","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"橋本広大","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"被害者が使用する自動車にＧＰＳ機能付きの電子機器を密かに取り付け、被害者の動静を把握した被告人の行為について、ストーカー規制法違反で起訴された事案の控訴審において、当該行為は、ストーカー規制法二条一項一号にいう「見張り」には該当しないとして、被告人を有罪とした原判決を破棄し、原裁判所に差し戻した事例の検討。","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"被害者が使用する自動車にＧＰＳ機能付きの電子機器を密かに取り付け、被害者の動静を把握した被告人の行為について、ストーカー規制法違反で起訴された事案の控訴審において、当該行為は、ストーカー規制法二条一項一号にいう「見張り」には該当しないとして、被告人を有罪とした原判決を破棄し、原裁判所に差し戻した事例の検討。","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1699597328745"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-11-09"},"publish_date":"2023-11-09","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000357","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["被害者が使用する自動車にＧＰＳ機能付きの電子機器を密かに取り付け、被害者の動静を把握した被告人の行為について、ストーカー規制法違反で起訴された事案の控訴審において、当該行為は、ストーカー規制法二条一項一号にいう「見張り」には該当しないとして、被告人を有罪とした原判決を破棄し、原裁判所に差し戻した事例の検討。"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-04-11T07:10:26.286178+00:00"}