{"created":"2023-12-06T09:13:04.925363+00:00","id":2000496,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"e5ea6bd9-9841-4020-a39d-aa3a2f9bfb4b"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2000496","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000496"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000496","sets":["333:1701847425705"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-10-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3-4","bibliographicPageEnd":"388","bibliographicPageStart":"373","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"128","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"控訴審において第一審の無罪判決を破棄し有罪を自判するに当たっては事実の取調べを行わなければならないとする従来の判例理論を維持した最高裁令和2 年1 月23 日第一小法廷判決の検討。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山田,峻悠","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ヤマダ,タカハル"},{"creatorName":"YAMADA,Takaharu"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"0009-6296_128_3-4_373-388.pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000496/files/0009-6296_128_3-4_373-388.pdf"},"version_id":"a7536793-6ad7-4225-97c5-2646f25cbe76"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"控訴審","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"事実の取調べ","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"直接主義","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"口頭主義","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"被告人の防御権","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"破棄・自判","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"心証比較説","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"論理則・経験則違反説","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"第一審判決が公訴事実の存在を認めるに足りる証明がないとして，被告人に対し，無罪を言い渡した場合に，控訴審において第一審判決を破棄し，自ら何ら事実の取調べをすることなく，訴訟記録及び第一審裁判所において取り調べた証拠のみによって，直ちに公訴事実の存在を確定し有罪の判決をすることは，刑訴法400条ただし書の許さないところとする最高裁判例は，刑訴法の仕組み及び運用が大きく変わったことなど原判決の挙げる諸事情を踏まえても，いまなおこれを変更すべきものとは認められないとされた事例","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"第一審判決が公訴事実の存在を認めるに足りる証明がないとして，被告人に対し，無罪を言い渡した場合に，控訴審において第一審判決を破棄し，自ら何ら事実の取調べをすることなく，訴訟記録及び第一審裁判所において取り調べた証拠のみによって，直ちに公訴事実の存在を確定し有罪の判決をすることは，刑訴法400条ただし書の許さないところとする最高裁判例は，刑訴法の仕組み及び運用が大きく変わったことなど原判決の挙げる諸事情を踏まえても，いまなおこれを変更すべきものとは認められないとされた事例","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1701847425705"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-12-06"},"publish_date":"2023-12-06","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000496","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["第一審判決が公訴事実の存在を認めるに足りる証明がないとして，被告人に対し，無罪を言い渡した場合に，控訴審において第一審判決を破棄し，自ら何ら事実の取調べをすることなく，訴訟記録及び第一審裁判所において取り調べた証拠のみによって，直ちに公訴事実の存在を確定し有罪の判決をすることは，刑訴法400条ただし書の許さないところとする最高裁判例は，刑訴法の仕組み及び運用が大きく変わったことなど原判決の挙げる諸事情を踏まえても，いまなおこれを変更すべきものとは認められないとされた事例"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-12-07T00:20:43.630605+00:00"}