WEKO3
アイテム
The Transformation of German European Policy Realism, Constructivism, and Realist Constructivism
https://doi.org/10.24789/0002000946
https://doi.org/10.24789/0002000946c066e5fb-06bc-4684-a8e4-3bc3f4412907
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ISSCU_RP-8.pdf
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-05-30 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | The Transformation of German European Policy Realism, Constructivism, and Realist Constructivism | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | German European policy | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | transformation of foreign policy | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | realism | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | constructivism | |||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||
| 主題 | realist constructivism | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24789/0002000946 | |||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||
| 著者 |
JO,Sam-Sang
× JO,Sam-Sang
|
|||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Since the end of the Cold War, there have been plenty of debates on the characteristic and transformation of German European policy. The primary debates have occurred between realism and constructivism. Realism interprets German European policy as an exercise of self-interested behavior. To realists, it is natural for the Berlin Republic to adopt a more interest-oriented approach. In contrast, constructivism, paying attention to normative factors, contends that German European policy is conditioned by the collective norms which are socially constructed by negotiated understandings of past historical events such as the Holocaust. To constructivists, the Berlin Republic is reluctant to deviate from the Bonn Republic’s pro-European policy. It is no doubt that realist and constructivist approach has made a contribution to our understanding of nature and transformation of German European policy. Yet, this study posits that German European policy is much more complex than mainstream IR theories explain. It is because mainstream IR approaches take into consideration only one side of co-constitution—either national interests or collective norms. This study argues that, by incorporating the insights of realist constructivism, we can overcome the problem whereby the contemporary IR sub-field has failed to explain the complex of German European policy. | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 社会科学研究所 ISSCU Reseach Papers 巻 8, p. 1-14, 発行日 2021-02-01 |
|||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||
| 出版者 | Institute of Social Sciences, Chuo University, Japan | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||
| 権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||
