{"created":"2024-10-02T09:19:40.552948+00:00","id":2001808,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"19004fe0-9f2c-4c8b-b642-f2a3dac1a614"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2001808","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2001808"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001808","sets":["333:1727860080377"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"bibliographic_information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-02-29","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"7-8","bibliographicPageEnd":"262","bibliographicPageStart":"237","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"130","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　「一般的法義務の免除」に関する判決として，アメリカで判例法理となっているSmith判決に対しては，賛否両論示されている。本稿は，このSmith判決を題材に，改めて法義務からの免除を求めることについて考察をしている。\n　具体的には，“court anarchy”という，Scalia裁判官による法廷意見の判示を取り上げる。その結果，この判示は，法義務の免除の限界が共同体の維持にあることを示しつつ，法義務の免除が拡大されることについて懸念を示していた。これは，現在のアメリカにおける法義務の免除に照らし合わせるといくつかの指摘をすることが可能である。さらに，法義務の免除を考える際の新たな視点についても明らかにしている。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"太田,信","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"オオタ,マコト"},{"creatorName":"OTA,Makoto"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"0009-6296_130_7-8_237-262.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"383.4 KB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001808/files/0009-6296_130_7-8_237-262.pdf"},"version_id":"d3b942bb-d50c-4ad4-8bc5-acce006aa5bb"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"一般的法義務の免除","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"修正1条","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Scalia","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"item_resource_type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"「一般的法義務の免除」とその限界","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"「一般的法義務の免除」とその限界","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Religious Exemption and its Limits","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1727860080377"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-09-27"},"publish_date":"2024-09-27","publish_status":"0","recid":"2001808","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["「一般的法義務の免除」とその限界"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-10-02T09:24:18.088683+00:00"}