{"created":"2024-10-03T00:42:32.539301+00:00","id":2001843,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"968010fa-4e16-410b-98ab-5f9f8ab3f1f8"},"_deposit":{"created_by":8,"id":"2001843","owners":[8],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2001843"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001843","sets":["333:1727915613386"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"bibliographic_information","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-03-25","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"11-12","bibliographicPageEnd":"70","bibliographicPageStart":"49","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"130","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"法学新報","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　本稿は，同性婚をめぐる日本の訴訟を題材に，憲法24条の解釈につきオリジナリズムやテクスチュアリズムに関するアメリカの議論を参考に検討するものである。これらの解釈は，解釈主体として（特に）裁判所に着目する手法である点を特徴として指摘できる。本稿は，日本国憲法24条の意義につき，婚姻及び家族関係に関して立法裁量を採用する日本の裁判所の状況を踏まえた上で，オリジナリズムの解釈手法に注目する。本稿は，合衆国憲法典の共通善の意義に触れながらオリジナリズムを展開するLee Strangの「憲法コミュニケーションモデル」を参考にしつつ，これと共通善の立憲主義に基づくAdrian Vermeuleの見解を対比させながら，アメリカのオリジナリズムの意義と問題点を探る。本稿は，これらの作業を通じて，最後に，日本国憲法24条の意義につき立法府及び裁判所の役割について検討を行うものである。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"法学新報編集委員会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0009-6296","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"阿部,純子","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"アベ,ジュンコ"},{"creatorName":"ABE,Junko"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","filename":"0009-6296_130_11-12_49-70.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"338.8 KB"}],"mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001843/files/0009-6296_130_11-12_49-70.pdf"},"version_id":"785f1566-7d29-43fb-99c0-07296f1fa1ac"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"婚姻及び家族","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"立法裁量","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"裁判所の憲法解釈","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"同性婚","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"オリジナリズム","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"共通善","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Lee Strang","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Adrian Vermeule","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"item_resource_type","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"婚姻及び家族関係をめぐる立法裁量と裁判所の憲法解釈(1) : L. Strangの「オリジナリズム」を批判的検討対象として","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"婚姻及び家族関係をめぐる立法裁量と裁判所の憲法解釈(1) : L. Strangの「オリジナリズム」を批判的検討対象として","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"Limits of Legislative Authority in the Constitutional Cases regarding “Marriage and the Family” : A Critical Analysis of Originalism in the Framework of L. Strang","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"8","path":["1727915613386"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-10-03"},"publish_date":"2024-10-03","publish_status":"0","recid":"2001843","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["婚姻及び家族関係をめぐる立法裁量と裁判所の憲法解釈(1) : L. Strangの「オリジナリズム」を批判的検討対象として"],"weko_creator_id":"8","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-10-03T00:52:12.022060+00:00"}