{"created":"2023-05-15T13:48:44.589385+00:00","id":8806,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"661f6265-bc5a-4e6f-883b-559fc8cc542e"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"8806","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"8806"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008806","sets":["271:496"]},"author_link":["31394","38905"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2016-06-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"297","bibliographicPageStart":"275","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"50","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"比較法雑誌"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　患者の事前指示を作成していないが，意思推定のための手がかりを残していた患者の延命治療の中止の是非が問われたドイツの民事判例についての検討。\n　同決定は，ドイツ民法1901条aの解釈論を展開し，事前指示が作成されていない場合は，同条2項の問題であるが，そこでは「治療上の希望」と「推定的意思」が区別されるとしたことを確認した上で，両者の要件と効果の違いについて検討した上で，わが国への示唆を探るものである。","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_full_name_32":{"attribute_name":"著者別名(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"31394","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki","nameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"日本比較法研究所"}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0010-4116","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山本, 紘之"},{"creatorName":"ヤマモト, ヒロユキ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"38905","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-04-25"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"0010-4116_50_1_275~297.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"490.6 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"本文を見る","url":"https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/8806/files/0010-4116_50_1_275~297.pdf"},"version_id":"f65943ab-cb52-4439-b6af-186b51983bce"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"ドイツ刑法研究会","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"終末期医療","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"延命治療","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"尊厳死","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"事前指示","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"リビングウィル","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"推定的意思","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"ドイツ刑事判例研究(91) 生命維持措置の中止に関する世話裁判所の許可が不要となる要件および覚醒昏睡にある患者の推定的意思を探知するための要件","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ドイツ刑事判例研究(91) 生命維持措置の中止に関する世話裁判所の許可が不要となる要件および覚醒昏睡にある患者の推定的意思を探知するための要件"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"1","path":["496"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2017-12-13"},"publish_date":"2017-12-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"8806","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ドイツ刑事判例研究(91) 生命維持措置の中止に関する世話裁判所の許可が不要となる要件および覚醒昏睡にある患者の推定的意思を探知するための要件"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T17:47:35.963679+00:00"}