WEKO3
アイテム
クロアチアにおける同性カップル法制化と近代法経験
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12718
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12718fc894053-4bd4-4b95-8106-dc8fc8dc05d9
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
本文を見る (999.0 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2021-01-19 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | クロアチアにおける同性カップル法制化と近代法経験 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Legal Recognition for Same-Sex Couples in Croatia and the Influence of the Modern Law Experience | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | クロアチア | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 同性カップル法制化 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 同性生活パートナーシップ法 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 近代法経験 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 西欧法継受 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | クロアチア法史 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | ハンガリー法史 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | オーストリア一般民法典 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | カトリック | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 西欧帰属意識 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 封建法 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 文化圏 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者 |
伊藤, 知義
× 伊藤, 知義
|
|||||||||
| 著者別名(英) | ||||||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||||||
| 識別子 | 30335 | |||||||||
| 姓名 | ITO, Tomoyoshi | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Croatia enacted a law on same-sex life partnership in 2014. It affords same-sex couples almost the same rights as those of married or extramarital heterosexual couples with the exception of the right of adoption. Croatia was part of the former Yugoslavia for about seven decades. Among the ex-constituent members, Slovenia and Croatia recognize same sex partnerships. Serbia,Montenegro, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and (Northern) Macedonia do not. All of the six countries reject same sex marriage. This paper discusses the lawmaking process in Croatia and what makes the difference between these two groups. It gives particular attention to why Serbia and Croatia, which belonged to one state for such a long time, have take different paths. Four factors are possible causes: history, religion, international circumstances, and domestic politics. Pre-modern era Croatia belonged to the central European legal tradition as part of Hungary or Austria, that is—the Hapsburg monarchy. Serbia, on the other hand, was part of the Ottoman Empire. Those different experiences affected their reception of modern law. Croatia always identified with the Hapsburg monarchy—a part of the West. Serbia began efforts to catch up with the West in the beginning of the 19th century, when the Ottoman Empire retreated. The two nations are also different religiously. Croatians believe in the Catholic Church. Serbians are aligned with the Orthodox Church. Modernism arose out of Protestantism—a variation of Catholicism, the origin of which was the Western Roman Empire. The Orthodox Church, by contrast, traced its roots to the Byzantine Empire. So, it remained reluctant to embrance modernism. For Croatians, modernism is theirs. For Serbians, it is not. Since the collapse of Socialism, Serbia has been embroiled in conflict. It waged civil wars against Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo. Serbia’s actions were labeled “ethnic cleansing,” and the country faced economic sanctions by the West and bombing by NATO. Serbian people felt they had been excluded from Europe, though the country had continuously sought EU membership. It was and still is difficult for them to become completely westernized. Croatia, however, had already been accepted by the West, to which it returned. It enjoyed peacetime after the end of the civil war and had enough time and space to think about issues such as protection of LGBT human rights, as did, Hungary and Austria. These factors explain to some extent the divergent Croatian and Serbian attitudes toward legal recognition of same-sex partnerships. |
|||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
中央ロー・ジャーナル 巻 17, 号 1, p. 3-27, 発行日 2020-06-30 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会 | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1349-6239 | |||||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||||
| 権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
