WEKO3
アイテム
生成AIと著作権に関する覚書－米国とEUにおける最近の動向－
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000954
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000954ee399a13-8471-4594-a2cf-b0a6c9b90db3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
1349-6239_20_3_59-98.pdf
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-06-20 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 生成AIと著作権に関する覚書－米国とEUにおける最近の動向－ | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Memorandum on Generative AI and Copyright: Recent Trends in the United States and the European Union | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 生成AI | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 著作権 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | 米国著作権法 | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | AI法 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者 |
泉,克幸
× 泉,克幸
|
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | As various issues related to generative AI have emerged, there has been much discussion in many countries on how to deal with or regulate such issues. One of the problems associated with the use of generative AI is the issue of copyright law. This paper focuses on the United States and the European Union (EU), and introduces some of the relevant trends and provides some discussion. Chapter 1 discusses the Thaler case. In this case, a federal district court held that the author must be a human being, and therefore, a copyright registration as a "generated AI" is not allowed. In Chapter 2, I reviewed the legislative status of the EU AI Act and its contents. It then pointed out that Article 28b4c) of the proposed amendment of the European Parliament is particularly important in relation to the generated AI and copyright. The analysis revealed the importance of discussions beyond the framework of copyright law. In Chapter 3, three ongoing cases in the U.S. were introduced, with reference to Professor Samuelson's two papers during the analysis. As a conclusion, it was shown that copyright infringement is likely not to be established either in the learning stage of the generative AI or in the generation stage of the work. At the end of the paper, a brief evaluation of the above conclusions is made and the relationship with Japanese law is discussed. |
|||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 中央ロー・ジャーナル 巻 20, 号 3, p. 59-98, 発行日 2023-12-20 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1349-6239 | |||||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
