WEKO3
アイテム
大正刑事訴訟法における「存留養親」条項導入について
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/17887
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/17887d1ff1825-d531-4afc-acff-844c53df595d
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
本文を見る (1.5 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2023-02-02 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 大正刑事訴訟法における「存留養親」条項導入について | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Introduction of the Provision “Permitting a Culprit to Support Lineal Elders” in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1922 | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 大正刑事訴訟法 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 存留養親 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 自由刑の執行停止規定 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 淳風美俗 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
赤城, 美恵子
× 赤城, 美恵子 |
|||||
著者別名(英) | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 59835 | |||||
姓名 | AKAGI, Mieko | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The criminal code of ancient China had a provision about “Permitting a Culprit to Support Lineal Elders” . This provision, based on Confucian morality, reduced the punishment given to a person whose grandparents or parents were elderly, ill, or disabled, and who had no adult siblings or others to take care of them. In some cases, such a person was exempted from punishment altogether. Japan adopted this type of provision in the Chinese-influenced Yoro Code and the early Meiji Penal Code. However, it was not carried over in Japan’s first full-fledged modern Western-style criminal procedure code of 1882, or in the subsequent Criminal Procedure Law of 1890. Nonetheless, the Code of Criminal Procedure, enacted in 1922, included it as one of the grounds for discretionary suspension of execution of imprisonment. This treatment was maintained in the current Code of Criminal Procedure. When the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1922 was enacted, discussions occurred about how to provide for discretionary suspension of imprisonment. Questions were raised as to whether protection of the interests of the prisoners’ families, also found in German law, was the ground for the suspension of execution. In the end, the provision was adopted because it allowed the preservation of traditional “beautiful customs filled with humanity.” |
|||||
書誌情報 |
中央ロー・ジャーナル en : Chuo Law Journal 巻 19, 号 1, p. 3-40, 発行日 2022-06-30 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1349-6239 | |||||
権利 | ||||||
権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |