WEKO3
アイテム
電子署名法に基づく推定効の及ぶ電子署名の射程
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000184
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000184103ddbe8-0df4-40fb-8624-0eb80b1f437a
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
0010-4116_31_33-45.pdf
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-09-25 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 電子署名法に基づく推定効の及ぶ電子署名の射程 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | The Legal Range of Electronic Signatures That Have“Presumption Effect” under Electronic Signature Act of Japan | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | electronic signature act of Japan | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | presumption effects | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | identification | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | authentication | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | electronic signature with the assistance of a third party | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 著者 |
海野,敦史
× 海野,敦史
|
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | While the legal range of electronic signature that has “presumption effects” under Article 3 of the electronic signature act of Japan （hereinafter “act”） has been ambiguous, this paper attempts to make it clear by identifying the following conditions. First, it has to be the electronic signature defined by Article 2 of the act. Thus, it needs to have the function to identify the person who made the signature by the fact relevant to the measures taken. It should also have the function to find falsification, if any, of the electronic records that have electronic signatures. Second, it has to be the electronic signature that can be made only by the empowered signer. Therefore, it needs to have processes of the identification to confirm the existence of the signer as a writer of an electronic document as well as the authentication to check the right signer via different factors. It is also required to ensure the safety of the system of the signature in view of the necessity of the proper management of “requisite code and property.” In particular, in the electronic signature with the assistance of a third party, system safety in the context of the internal processes of service providers （third parties） should be fully ensured so that unauthorized persons cannot make an access to the signature. It implies that the proper authentication process by using multiple factors should be ensured to confirm that only the right signer can direct service providers with regards to the signature. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| bibliographic_information |
ja : 総合政策研究 en : Japanese Journal of Policy and Culture 巻 31, p. 33-45, 発行日 2023-03-15 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 総合政策学部 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1341-7827 | |||||||||
| 権利 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
